Lawyers are professionals, but algorithmic litigation is not necessarily professional?

What has been making headlines recently is the incident of King of Glory being sued by players. Just after the Huahai losing streak, the matching mechanism was targeted again. This time, a Ms. Sun, on the grounds of her right to know, took legal action to demand that the official disclose the principles of the matching system.

The gaming community is all watching the drama unfold as the lawsuit nears its opening. Players are deeply curious: will justice prevail, or will capital be defeated? This assertion is a bit of a conspiracy theory. Summoners have experienced poor matches, especially losing streaks. After 30 minutes of hard work, winning one game, only to surrender within ten minutes of the next, anyone would be driven mad.

Some felt Ms. Sun was exaggerating, while others resonated with her. Her perseverance seemed to offer hope to ordinary people. Wangzhe was reluctant to explain this, lest it amplify public opinion and interfere with the judiciary. Professional gaming journalists, with varying opinions, believe that gaming itself is a very small area in the legal world. After a lawsuit, almost every word must be handled with extreme caution. For example, her statement that "matching mechanisms are trade secrets" could easily be misinterpreted as a "competitive tactic," as if it were a strategy to attract and retain users.

Furthermore, there's no definitive definition of whether matching mechanisms are part of algorithms. Algorithms cover a much wider range of areas, and Ms. Sun's constant use of video platforms as examples only serves to confuse the concepts. Is there a real connection between the two? While legal action is a good way to exert pressure, it doesn't necessarily drive reform, as the King of Glory community actively engages in communication and optimization.