Honor of Kings: The human-computer experience in the ranking match is far better than real-person operation, and netizens agree.

As a national mobile game, Honor of Kings is deeply loved by everyone. Many times, it is not that the game content is not appealing, but the extremely bad experience that stimulates the urge to delete the game. In a five-player competitive game, just facing the enemy is a difficult task. The people who often lose the game are teammates matched by the system. They are not tactful, do not follow the team, play in stand-alone mode, have no contribution, have below-average awareness, and their fighting methods make people doubt their lives. They are even more outrageous than artificial intelligence.

Planning optimizes the environment, and the quality of players remains unchanged

Despite constant online complaints, I've invested so much time and resources in the game, having played it for years and collected countless skins. Limited editions are constantly being released, and I can't bear to uninstall it. Despite being bombarded with negative reviews online, the game has recently been diligently optimized and updated to address the issue of "tanking." They've also added features like kicking players out for AFK, double stars for ranked gold medals, no star loss for ranked gold medals, and three stars for top lanes, all designed to provide players with a superior combat experience. However, combat is only part of achieving ultimate victory; ultimately, it's all about taking towers, and winning or losing is uncertain.

The phenomenon is so bizarre. Some players have experienced consecutive wins followed by consecutive losses, as if they were cursed. They had just enjoyed the sense of superiority of winning the game and became more and more courageous. Later, they always lost points at critical moments for no reason. They felt that there was a system behind the scenes playing tricks and deliberately making people lose the game. Summoners on the Internet accused the system of manipulating data. A female lawyer player even sued Tencent on the grounds of the right to know, demanding transparency in the ranking matches. Otherwise, if the situation continues, it will only waste consumers' time. Players are guests of the game, and no one wants to be deceived or played around.

Teammate is an actor

I believe many players have similar experiences. Assuming that teammates and opponents are equally strong and evenly matched, they can have a truly fair competition. In fact, if they lose the game, they will be willing to do so. There is a back-and-forth and they can learn something from it. If they meet a strong enemy, they will also feel that the game is challenging and adds fun. They will be convinced and will not get angry. The problem is that everyone you meet in the qualifying match is an actor. How would you feel then?