The first case of King of Glory's algorithm corruption may spread across the gaming world, affecting card draw mechanisms as well? (Part 2)

Small matters among professionals, when they become big, become the fuse that leads the industry off the track of rationality and become the milestone of game reform. Players are accustomed to accepting the changes and transformations of the game. If they don’t like it, they will be forced to quit the game. Abandoning the game is equivalent to wasting years of effort. From bombarding the official blog with complaints, the new phenomenon now is to take legal action. The future of games

The probability of the lottery is indicated and has nothing to do with the algorithm

The probability of winning a lottery is like unboxing a blind box. The probability provides fun. Players who don't win will feel indignant and can only blame their bad luck. It is both metaphysics and the official way of making money. It has nothing to do with algorithms. Rumors stop at the wise, and everyone just waits for the result of the court trial.

Talking about the lawsuit, the impression given was that it was an extremely urgent matter, which developed to the point where it was sued by players, and the news attempted to use the title to distort the situation. With extensive coverage, the matter triggered a new round of discussion. The netizens certainly couldn't wait for the decline of Honor of Kings, but if we sort out the background of the incident, it started in June 2024. Ms. Sun initially simply shared her views on the matching mechanism on online platforms such as Xiaohongshu, Douyin, and Bilibili. She felt that the system might be manipulating the player's winning rate. As a lawyer, she chose to handle it professionally and sued the King of Glory on the grounds of the right to know. The purpose was to know the specific situation and did not want to continue the game in confusion. There was no mention of any compensation, so netizens did not need to fan the flames.

Multiple factors influence the winning and losing of a game

Regarding the algorithm lawsuit, some senior journalists also noticed this point in the early days and started a discussion. They believed that it was likely to happen in the future, but they did not pay too much attention to it. Because objectively analyzing the win or loss of a game, as a competitive game, involves lineup matching, field reaction, equipment selection ideas, operation skills, awareness and observation, etc. Perhaps the system can really assign you teammates of lower level, even if it is human-computer interaction, but the hero in your hand is actually operated by you through buttons and keyboard. The feel, team communication, close coordination, and even mental focus are all beyond your control.

There are many unreasonable points in the argument of manipulating the winning rate. Of course, fair confrontation is the core of the survival of the King. If the image collapses, the consequences will be unimaginable.