League of Legends: Veteran player protests against refusing to participate, fans are furious and criticize him for being arrogant despite not achieving results.

No one understands the starting point of the transfer reform. The official purpose is to suppress the high salaries of players. The difference between the price of players and the price of their bids is too large, resulting in a loss of millions of yuan in annual salary. Naturally, protests have broken out. Now, the LPL is in a dilemma. Reform is urgent. If players boycott the season, it will be difficult for the competition to continue. In the future, the viewership will plummet, and it will be difficult to give an explanation to the league, the audience, the organizers, the sponsors, etc.

In the LPL region, the roster combinations are always the same.

League of Legends has never been as dominant as CS2, with new players emerging daily and exciting battles between veterans and rookies. Veterans cannot afford to be complacent or arrogant, as this will only ruin their future, as they could be replaced by underage rookies at any time. Being demoted would be disastrous. Even if they achieve good results, they might retire and have to transition into coaching. While there are many League of Legends players, fame inevitably attracts a specific group of people, much like the artists promoted by TV channels and broadcasting companies. They appear on television every day, and regardless of the script, it's always the same cast of actors being cast. To put it nicely, it's to hone their acting skills; to put it bluntly, it's because they lack originality. Hong Kong dramas focus on stars, not scripts, creating countless classics that are unforgettable. Newcomers, on the other hand, are often criticized for their lack of experience, making the drama seem unwatchable.

In contrast, Western dramas feature numerous free agents, each a seasoned performer with diverse themes and a compelling storyline, with little regard for the actors' fame, allowing viewers to become fully engaged. This phenomenon is mirrored in the LPL region, where veteran players act like entertainers, refusing to participate during the off-season as a silent protest. To them, this is seen as a deprivation of benefits, deliberate suppression, and a choice to underperform in the first stage of next year's season, relying on their existing popularity.

Fans' support subtly mocked the veterans for taking a break and making way for newcomers.

I thought the fan club would consider things from their perspective, but they said they deserved it. They had no achievements to begin with, acted like big shots, demanded high prices, and were just throwing the game. They were paid millions a year, yet they only made it to the top 8 or top 16. What right did the veterans who were tired of watching them have? Since they loved to rest so much, then let them take a long break. Their departure would give new people a chance to step up, bring in fresh blood, and perhaps things would look different.

Every year, with the same roster, the so-called transfers are just teams swapping players to make up a round number. They're still the same group of players, just with different combinations. Fans get tired of it and think it's nice to see some new faces occasionally. In this particular incident, which side do you support?